Electron Charger ECEVC-L2-19KW-C vs Siemens Industry Inc 8EM1312-5CF18-0FA3
The Electron Charger ECEVC-L2-19KW-C outputs 80 A (19.2 kW) versus 48 A (11.52 kW) for the Siemens Industry Inc 8EM1312-5CF18-0FA3 — about 67% faster charging on vehicles that can accept it. The Siemens Industry Inc 8EM1312-5CF18-0FA3 draws less standby power (5.42 W vs 6.43 W). The Siemens Industry Inc 8EM1312-5CF18-0FA3 has the longer charging cable (21 ft vs 16 ft).
| Electron Charger ECEVC-L2-19KW-C | Siemens Industry Inc 8EM1312-5CF18-0FA3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Connector type | J1772 | J1772 |
| Max output current | 80 A | 48 A |
| Max output power | 19.2 kW | 11.52 kW |
| Wi-Fi / app connected | Yes | Yes |
| Cable length | 16 ft | 21 ft |
| ENERGY STAR certified | Yes | Yes |
| Input voltage | 240 V | 240 V |
| Standby power draw | 6.43 W | 5.42 W |
Frequently asked questions
Which is faster, the Electron Charger ECEVC-L2-19KW-C or the Siemens Industry Inc 8EM1312-5CF18-0FA3?
The Electron Charger ECEVC-L2-19KW-C: 80 A (19.2 kW) against 48 A (11.52 kW), provided your EV's onboard charger can use the extra power.
Are the Electron Charger ECEVC-L2-19KW-C and Siemens Industry Inc 8EM1312-5CF18-0FA3 both ENERGY STAR certified?
Yes — every charger in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified EVSE list.