EvoCharge W1-1962-2PT0 vs FLO Home
The FLO Home outputs 50 A (12 kW) versus 40 A (9.6 kW) for the EvoCharge W1-1962-2PT0 — about 25% faster charging on vehicles that can accept it. Only the FLO Home offers Wi-Fi/app connectivity. The EvoCharge W1-1962-2PT0 draws less standby power (1.68 W vs 2.69 W).
| EvoCharge W1-1962-2PT0 | FLO Home | |
|---|---|---|
| Connector type | J1772 | J1772 |
| Max output current | 40 A | 50 A |
| Max output power | 9.6 kW | 12 kW |
| Wi-Fi / app connected | No | Yes |
| Cable length | 25 ft | 25 ft |
| ENERGY STAR certified | Yes | Yes |
| Input voltage | 240 V | 240 V |
| Standby power draw | 1.68 W | 2.69 W |
Frequently asked questions
Which is faster, the EvoCharge W1-1962-2PT0 or the FLO Home?
The FLO Home: 50 A (12 kW) against 40 A (9.6 kW), provided your EV's onboard charger can use the extra power.
Are the EvoCharge W1-1962-2PT0 and FLO Home both ENERGY STAR certified?
Yes — every charger in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified EVSE list.