Blink HQ200 vs EcoFlow PowerPulse EV Charger (9.6kW)
The Blink HQ200 outputs 50 A (12 kW) versus 40 A (9.6 kW) for the EcoFlow PowerPulse EV Charger (9.6kW) — about 25% faster charging on vehicles that can accept it. Only the EcoFlow PowerPulse EV Charger (9.6kW) offers Wi-Fi/app connectivity. The Blink HQ200 draws less standby power (0.96 W vs 5.11 W). The EcoFlow PowerPulse EV Charger (9.6kW) has the longer charging cable (24 ft vs 23 ft).
| Blink HQ200 | EcoFlow PowerPulse EV Charger (9.6kW) | |
|---|---|---|
| Connector type | J1772 | J1772 |
| Max output current | 50 A | 40 A |
| Max output power | 12 kW | 9.6 kW |
| Wi-Fi / app connected | No | Yes |
| Cable length | 23 ft | 24 ft |
| ENERGY STAR certified | Yes | Yes |
| Input voltage | 240 V | 240 V |
| Standby power draw | 0.96 W | 5.11 W |
Frequently asked questions
Which is faster, the Blink HQ200 or the EcoFlow PowerPulse EV Charger (9.6kW)?
The Blink HQ200: 50 A (12 kW) against 40 A (9.6 kW), provided your EV's onboard charger can use the extra power.
Are the Blink HQ200 and EcoFlow PowerPulse EV Charger (9.6kW) both ENERGY STAR certified?
Yes — every charger in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified EVSE list.