Electron Charger EC-EVC10/48AC/01C/XX/RF/4G vs EvoCharge W1-1962-2PT0
The Electron Charger EC-EVC10/48AC/01C/XX/RF/4G outputs 48 A (11.52 kW) versus 40 A (9.6 kW) for the EvoCharge W1-1962-2PT0 — about 20% faster charging on vehicles that can accept it. Only the Electron Charger EC-EVC10/48AC/01C/XX/RF/4G offers Wi-Fi/app connectivity. The EvoCharge W1-1962-2PT0 draws less standby power (1.68 W vs 3.78 W). The EvoCharge W1-1962-2PT0 has the longer charging cable (25 ft vs 18 ft).
| Electron Charger EC-EVC10/48AC/01C/XX/RF/4G | EvoCharge W1-1962-2PT0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Connector type | J1772 | J1772 |
| Max output current | 48 A | 40 A |
| Max output power | 11.52 kW | 9.6 kW |
| Wi-Fi / app connected | Yes | No |
| Cable length | 18 ft | 25 ft |
| ENERGY STAR certified | Yes | Yes |
| Input voltage | 240 V | 240 V |
| Standby power draw | 3.78 W | 1.68 W |
Frequently asked questions
Which is faster, the Electron Charger EC-EVC10/48AC/01C/XX/RF/4G or the EvoCharge W1-1962-2PT0?
The Electron Charger EC-EVC10/48AC/01C/XX/RF/4G: 48 A (11.52 kW) against 40 A (9.6 kW), provided your EV's onboard charger can use the extra power.
Are the Electron Charger EC-EVC10/48AC/01C/XX/RF/4G and EvoCharge W1-1962-2PT0 both ENERGY STAR certified?
Yes — every charger in this database is drawn from the U.S. EPA ENERGY STAR certified EVSE list.